Married couple with current assets of around £5 million
This planning ensured that should any of their children or grandchildren go bankrupt or get divorced, the money left to them was safeguarded. This was a major issue bearing in mind the size of the Estate.
Should they eventually decide to gift excess capital later on, the Trusts would already exist.
There was also a potential good IHT saving if in the likely event there was more than a one year gap between either spouse dying. This probable IHT saving would easily cover all the costs of setting up the Trusts making it an easy decision for the clients.
Both plans together ensured that the IHT problem was solved immediately.
Mr and Mrs Hill understood that in the long term this would be a very expensive method of solving the problem.
Other plans would be needed to reduce income tax and the cost of avoiding the IHT.
This placed £650,000 outside of the estate for IHT purposes after 7 years.
These funds were to be considered a giant emergency fund as it gave the clients access to the capital back if required over a period of 7 years – possible if long term care was ever required.
After 7 years the maximum policy cover could be reviewed and reduced.
The new investment portfolio matched the client’s attitude to investment risk better and had a potential for higher returns should the Discretionary Fund Manager continue with the good performance and risk management they had already demonstrated.
This avoided Mr and Mrs Hill's assets increasing over time by the excess income being added to capital.
It put the money into pensions which, for both sons, attracted 40% relief as they were both higher rate tax payers.
The sons could not access the funds until age 57 and so their lifestyles were not being funded as it was also agreed both sons would also fund the pensions from their extra tax relief.
Pension funds of £3,600 per year were set up for each grandchild to grow tax free over a long period of time.
Mr and Mrs Hill would make a further gift into Trust for their grandchildren of £650,000 in 7 years time as their gift into Trust allowance would be “freed up” again in 7 years time.
They would use the Trusts Bluebond had already set up for this purpose.
The money could be used and extracted tax free to pay for university education.
It could be used for a property deposit in the future.
Trustees who are the clients and their children would ensure the money was not misspent on frivolous things.
This planning ensured that should any of their children or grandchildren go bankrupt or get divorced, the money left to them was safeguarded. This was a major issue bearing in mind the size of the Estate.
Should they eventually decide to gift excess capital later on, the Trusts would already exist.
There was also a potential good IHT saving if in the likely event there was more than a one year gap between either spouse dying. This probable IHT saving would easily cover all the costs of setting up the Trusts making it an easy decision for the clients.
Both plans together ensured that the IHT problem was solved immediately.
Mr and Mrs Hill understood that in the long term this would be a very expensive method of solving the problem.
Other plans would be needed to reduce income tax and the cost of avoiding the IHT.
This placed £650,000 outside of the estate for IHT purposes after 7 years.
These funds were to be considered a giant emergency fund as it gave the clients access to the capital back if required over a period of 7 years – possible if long term care was ever required.
After 7 years the maximum policy cover could be reviewed and reduced.
The new investment portfolio better matched the client’s attitude to investment risk. It also had a potential for higher returns should the Discretionary Fund Manager continue with the good performance and risk management they had already demonstrated.
This avoided Mr and Mrs Hill's assets increasing over time by the excess income being added to capital.
It put the money into pensions which, for both sons, attracted 40% relief as they were both higher rate tax payers.
The sons could not access the funds until age 57 and so their lifestyles were not being funded as it was also agreed both sons would also fund the pensions from their extra tax relief.
Pension funds of £3,600 per year were set up for each grandchild to grow tax free over a long period of time.
Mr and Mrs Hill would make a further gift into Trust for their grandchildren of £650,000 in 7 years time as their gift into Trust allowance would be “freed up” again in 7 years time.
They would use the Trusts Bluebond had already set up for this purpose.
The money could be used and extracted tax free to pay for university education.
It could be used for a property deposit in the future.
Trustees who are the clients and their children would ensure the money was not misspent on frivolous things.
As part of the plan, Mr and Mrs Hill would hold a regular annual reviews with both Bluebond and the recommended IFAs to ensure the plans were adjusted as required in case of changes to circumstances or tax rules. It was also agreed that as they got older that their children would attend the annual review meetings with Bluebond.
Should it have arisen that one of the clients died earlier than expected and that there was insufficient time to gift away another £650,000 in 7 years time, then a Family Investment Company would have been suggested. As the assets were mainly in the main residence and investments, Mr and Mrs Hill preferred the simplicity of Trusts, investments into Business Relief Plans and outright gifts.
The plan for Mr and Mrs Hill is quite complex due to the size of the Estate. However, by dealing with in in stages together with their sons meant that they were able to achieve all of their objectives in eliminating their IHT liability. In this they would not be funding their son's lifestyle to too high a degree and protecting the whole Estate, keeping the money in the family bloodline. They also had unexpected benefits of saving a lot of income tax.
The plan for Mr and Mrs Hill is quite complex due to the size of the Estate. However, by dealing with in in stages together with their sons meant that they were able to achieve all of their objectives in eliminating their IHT liability. In this they would not be funding their son's lifestyle to too high a degree and protecting the whole Estate, keeping the money in the family bloodline. They also had unexpected benefits of saving a lot of income tax.
The information contained in this web site is for UK consumers only. Like most firms of solicitors and accountants, Bluebond Tax Planning is not regulated by the FCA. The content of this website does not constitute FCA regulated financial advice and all content is provided for general information purposes only. Bluebond is not responsible for any action you may take as a result of information on this site. All advice will be delivered on a personal basis once we fully understand your situation and our client agreements have been signed.