Married couple with current assets of around £1.5 million
This planning ensured that should any of their children or grandchildren go bankrupt or get divorced, the money left to them was safeguarded. This was a major issue bearing in mind the size of the Estate.
Should they eventually decide to gift excess capital later on, the Trusts would already exist.
There was also a potential good IHT saving if in the likely event there was more than a one year gap between either spouse dying. This probable IHT saving would easily cover all the costs of setting up the Trusts making it an easy decision for the clients.
The policy ensured that the IHT problem was solved if the value of their home and chattles eventually exceeded £1 million.
Other plans would be needed to reduce the IHT.
This placed £650,000 outside of the Estate for IHT purposes after 7 years.
These funds were to be considered a giant emergency fund as it gave the clients access to the capital back if required over a period of 7 years – possible if long term care was ever required.
The maximum gift into trust of £650,000 meant it only left them £150,000 is cash and investments. They felt they would gift £100,000 to their children when the youngest of them was 75 in 10 years time ( or earlier if required) giving the gift 7 years to fall outside of their Estate.
The new investment portfolio matched the client’s attitude to investment risk better and had a potential for higher returns should the Discretionary Fund Manager continue with the good performance and risk management they had already demonstrated.
This planning ensured that should any of their children or grandchildren go bankrupt or get divorced, the money left to them was safeguarded. This was a major issue bearing in mind the size of the Estate.
Should they eventually decide to gift excess capital later on, the Trusts would already exist.
There was also a potential good IHT saving if in the likely event there was more than a one year gap between either spouse dying. This probable IHT saving would easily cover all the costs of setting up the Trusts making it an easy decision for the clients.
The policy ensured that the IHT problem was solved if the value of their home and chattles eventually exceeded £1 million.
Other plans would be needed to reduce the IHT.
This placed £650,000 outside of the Estate for IHT purposes after 7 years.
These funds were to be considered a giant emergency fund as it gave the clients access to the capital back if required over a period of 7 years – possible if long term care was ever required.
The maximum gift into trust of £650,000 meant it only left them £150,000 is cash and investments. They felt they would gift £100,000 to their children when the youngest of them was 75 in 10 years time ( or earlier if required) giving the gift 7 years to fall outside of their Estate.
The new investment portfolio better matched the client’s attitude to investment risk. It also had a potential for higher returns should the discretionary fund manager continue with the good performance and risk management they had already demonstrated.
As part of the plan, Mr and Mrs Williams would hold a regular annual review with both Bluebond and the recommended IFAs to ensure the plans were adjusted as required in case of changes to circumstances or tax rules. It was also agreed that as the clients got older that their children would attend the annual review meetings with Bluebond.
If they could not afford to continue to gift the £6,000 a year from income, they would use some of the £100,000 left after gifting to the Reversionary Trusts to fund this money. They trusted their children to return the money if required.
The plan here was quite straightforward due to the size of the Estate. However, by dealing with the plan in stages, together with Mr and Mrs Williams's children meant that they were able to achieve all of their objectives in eliminating their IHT liability. They were able to protect the whole Estate and keep the money in the family bloodline.
Mr and Mrs Williams have been delighted with the return on their investments to date. They also continue to work with us and one of their children also attends the annual review meetings.
The plan here was quite straightforward due to the size of the Estate. However, by dealing with the plan in stages, together with Mr and Mrs Williams's children meant that they were able to achieve all of their objectives in eliminating their IHT liability. They were able to protect the whole Estate and keep the money in the family bloodline.
Mr and Mrs Williams have been delighted with the return on their investments to date. They also continue to work with us and one of their children also attends the annual review meetings.
The information contained in this web site is for UK consumers only. Like most firms of solicitors and accountants, Bluebond Tax Planning is not regulated by the FCA. The content of this website does not constitute FCA regulated financial advice and all content is provided for general information purposes only. Bluebond is not responsible for any action you may take as a result of information on this site. All advice will be delivered on a personal basis once we fully understand your situation and our client agreements have been signed.